Posts Tagged ‘sky-watcher’

Review of the SkyWatcher SupaTrak Auto Tracking Motorised Alt Azimuth Mount

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

I bought my SkyWatcher Explorer 130P telescope in March 2009, so I’ve had it for just over a year now (April 2010). One of the reasons I opted for this particular telescope was because it had a motorised mount. I knew nothing about mounts (or telescopes for that matter) at the time so I based my choice on what I had read on the Internet.

Am I pleased with the mount? well, kind of. In this post I’ll share my thoughts on what I like, and dislike, about it.

Good Points

1. Physically connecting the mount to the telescope tube and the tripod is very straightforward and can be done within a minute or so.

2. Setting up the software is also fairly easy to do. There is a one-off  task to set up the latitude for your location, which only needs to be redone if you use the telescope several miles from where the setup is done.  

3.  The setup process for each viewing session is simply a case of switching on the power supply while the telescope tube is horizontal and pointing north. 

4. Tracking objects works well so long as you have carried out steps 2 and 3 above accurately.

Bad Points

1. The battery pack does not have an on/off switch, meaning that you need to use the thumb screw to connect it to, and disconnect it from, the mount.

2. The mount has two servo motors: one for altitude adjustment and one for azimuth (horizontal) adjustment. I find that the azimuth motor seems to struggle sometimes, even when the batteries in the battery pack are new. The problem seems to be worse in the cold weather.

3. My handset broke after I had had the telescope for 11 months (see http://www.myastronomyblog.com/?p=269 for more information).

Photographing Saturn with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P Telescope

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

Date: 21st April 2010
Time: 9:30 – 10:15pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: SkyWatcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): Various

This post contains a set of photographs I took of Saturn on April 21, 2010, at about 10pm. All the photos were taken at the same magnification (52x), using my SkyWatcher Explorer 130P telescope and a FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR compact digital camera. The only variable was the exposure time.

This was an experiment for me, as I had no idea how long an exposure to use. I started off with an exposure of 8 seconds, and gradually reduced this down to 1/10 of a second. I’ve included a selection of photos with exposure times ranging from one second to 1/10th of a second. Exposure times above one second were way too over exposed, so I haven’t bothered to include any of them.

The astrophotography setup I use (telescope, camera and adapter) is described in the post Digital Camera Astrophotography for Absolute Beginners.

Photograph Exposure Time
in Seconds
Photo of Saturn with a 1 second exposure time 1
Photo of Saturn with a 1/3 of a second exposure time 1/3
Photo of Saturn with a 1/4 of a second exposure time 1/4
Photo of Saturn with a 1/6 of a second exposure time 1/6
Photo of Saturn with a 1/8 of a second exposure time 1/8
Photo of Saturn with a 1/10 of a second exposure time 1/10

You can see that a one second exposure time produces a photo that is over exposed; the 1/3 of a second exposure is also slightly over exposed. The 1/4 and 1/6 of a second exposure times produce the best results, with the 1/8 and 1/10 of a second exposure times producing slightly under exposed photos.

How many telescope eyepieces should I have?

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

When I bought my SkyWatcher Explorer 130P telescope it came with two eyepieces (25mm and 10mm) and a Barlow lens. The focal length of the telescope is 650mm, giving me the following range of magnifications:

Eyepiece Focal Length Gives a Magnification of With Barlow Lens (2x)
25 mm 26x 52x
10 mm 65x 130x

(Formula to calculate magnification is: telescope focal length / eyepiece focal length)

My initial thought was that I needed to rush out and buy a 4mm or 5mm eyepiece to crank up the magnification to 260x or more (using the Barlow lens), and I have to admit I did do this – well I bought a 5mm lens anyway.

And to be honest, I’m not sure it was really worth it. Focusing at 260x magnification is quite difficult and I find that most of the time I don’t go any higher than 130x, which I can achieve with my 10mm eyepiece and the Barlow lens.

Recently I bought a 40mm eyepiece, giving me magnifications of 16.25x and 32.5x. This, I get a lot of use out of because it’s really easy to find objects using it and it gives me a wide field of view.

So, in conclusion I would think very carefully about whether you really need to buy eyepieces that give high magnifications as you’ll probably do most of your star gazing at fairly low magnifications.

Problem with my SupaTrak Alt-Azimuth Mount

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

On Saturday (20th Feb, 2010) I was eagerly looking forward to taking a few more photos of Orion, but I had a nasty surprise when my SupaTrak Alt Azimuth mount refused to play ball.

When I switched on the handset/motorized mount, the Set and Go Cruise buttons starting flashing, and they wouldn’t stop. This rendered the the motorized mount useless as it refused to do anything.

Having put a post on a forum, it looks as though there might be a communication problem between the handset and the mount.

I bought my telescope (a Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P) just under a year ago, so it should still be under warranty if I need to return it. I hope it doesn’t come to that as I don’t want the hassle.

So, it looks as though for the time being I’ll have to revert to my 50mm reflector telescope … oh hum …

Update – 23 February

I put another post on a different forum, again asking the same question and, yes, it looks as though it is a communications problem between the handset and the alt-azimuth SupaTrak mount.

This morning I received an email from Telescope Planet asking me to return the handset. Hopefully, it is that rather than the mount, which would cost a lot more to send through the post.

Update – 04 March

Well, I’m still without a handset, so in effect I’m still without a telescope ! We’ve had some really clear nights recently as well, so it’s all a bit frustrating …

Update – 08 March

Still no word from Telescope Planet … and we’ve had some really clear skies just recently.

Update – 13 March

Today I received a new handset from Telescope Planet … but the problem still exists. I’ve sent another emal to Telescope Planet asking them what to do next. It’s looking as though the mount will need to be replaced.

Update – 18 March

I’m still without a working telescope. I feel frustrated at the moment because, although they are always very polite, I always feel that there is a lack of information from Telescope Planet as to what they are doing to resolve my problem.

I’m also aware that the nights are becoming lighter and I’m losing valuable astronomy sessions while my telescope is broken. I’ve also started looking at alternative telescopes – just in case I end up having to buy a new one. I need this situation with my broken scope to be resolved by the end of the month (March 10).

Update – 23 March

I’ve received an email from Telescope Planet asking me to package up the mount and handset so that they can be sent to the manufacturer for testing/repair. It feels a bit like pulling teeth, but I guess we’ll get there in the end.

Update – 30 March

Today I posted the mount, power supply pack and handset off to Optical Vision (the suppliers to Telescope Planet) so that the unit can be tested and, hopefully, fixed. I guess I just have to wait now.

Update – 08 April

I contacted Optical Vision today to see if they had made any progress with my ‘mount’ problem, but it was still waiting for a technician to test it. They rang me back later though to say that they had tested the mount and it was OK. They spoke to my wife so I’m not sure what was said exactly, but they’re returning everything to me – with another new handset (see 13th March entry above – I’ve been here before).

Anyway, everything should be with me by Monday (it’s Thursday today), so we’ll see.

Update – 16 April

Success – yesterday I received my mount, handset, and battery pack back from Optical Vision, and everything now works OK. The handset has been replaced so that must have been the problem (the replacement handset that Telescope Planet sent me a while ago must have been faulty).

So, in conclusion, a successful outcome even though it has taken eight weeks to resolve the problem. Everyone I have dealt with at Telescope Planet and Optical Vision has been very polite and helpful, although I have been frustrated sometimes by the slow progress.

Photographing Orion with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

Date: 17th February 2010
Time: 6pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: Not Used
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): N/A
Exposure (camera): 8 seconds

Photograph of Orion
Orion Constellation

Here is a photo of Orion I took at about 6pm on Wednesday 17th February, 2010.

I decided to not use my telescope for this shot, but to just stick my camera on a tripod and point it at the constellation.

I’m reasonably happy with it. You can easily see the main stars in the constellation (Betelgeuse in the top left corner and Rigel in the bottom right), and you can resolve the Orion Nebula, Messier 42 (M42, NGC 1976) – the brightest diffuse nebula in the sky – which is about 2/3 of the way down the image (in the dagger), just slightly to the right of centre. It looks slightly fuzzier than the other stars in the image.

FREE Software Downloads

Photographing Mars with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P Telescope

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Date: 30th January 2010
Time: 6pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): 1/60th of a second

Mars 52x magnification 1-60th second exposure
Mars – 30th January 2010

Here is my second attempt at photographing Mars – still not very successful ! I took a whole batch of photos and this was the best one … it’s a bit tricky this astrophotography.

In the end I had to settle with using an eyepiece that gave me a magnification of 52x. When I increased the magnification upto 130x, I couldn’t find Mars on the LCD screen of my digital camera.

I think one problem is that the camera lens does not align perfectly with the eyepiece when the camera is on the adapter, so if the field of view is not wide enough, the camera can’t see the object even though the object is visible through the telescope itself.

FREE Software Downloads

It’s frustrating sometimes …

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Although I really enjoy being an amature astronomer, it can be really frustrating sometimes. Take last night (26th January, 2010), for example …

The sky had been slowly clearing during the afternoon and I knew I was going to be on my own during the evening – my wife had a work-related dinner to go to … great I thought – I can spend as much time in the garden as I want to without having to worry about whether my wife was getting annoyed at being left on her own … again!

I have been desperate to get some good photos of Mars, and this week it’s closer to Earth than it will be for the next couple of years, so I’ve got to get out there soon.

So, at about 7pm I got my Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P out of the shed, along with a selection of eyepieces, and left them outside to get used to the cold (very cold) evening temperature … the sky was still really clear … great!

So, at about 7:30pm I put my coat on, etc and go outside. I look up and, yes, it’s still clear … great!

I then spend the next 10 minutes or so setting up the telescope and camera and, I’m just ready to go when I notice that I can’t see Mars anymore … or the moon for that matter … yes – it’s gone cloudy … s**t !! … I guess I’ll put everything away then … there’s always tomorrow …

FREE Software Downloads

A really bad photo of Mars

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Date: 17th January 2010
Time: 10pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): 1/60th of a second

Mars 52x magnification 1-60th second exposure
Mars !

OK, I know, this is not the best photo of Mars you’ve ever seen, but I thought I would post it here just to give an idea of how difficult it is to take photos of the night sky.

In my defence though, this was my first attempt at photographing the red planet, so to be honest I didn’t expect anything too impressive.

I also had a few problems trying to use my camera adapter (the thing that connects my digital camera to the telescope), and ended up having to use a lower magnification eyepiece (52x) than I had wanted to. I was also rushing because there was something on TV I wanted to watch.

I have now resolved the adapter problem though so, hopefully, my next attempt will be slightly better… we’ll see !

FREE Software Downloads

Digital Camera Astrophotography for Absolute Beginners

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

If you’re not completely new to astrophotography, you should probably quickly go back to your favourite search engine and perform another search, as it’s quite probable you know more about astrophotography than I do – so you won’t learn anything here.

OK, if you’re still reading, I guess you’re like me – extremely new to astrophotography. I’m a novice astronomer, with six months’ experience using my Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P telescope, and my photography experience is limited to pointing and clicking. Basically, I know virtually nothing about photography, and virtually nothing about astronomy.

The camera

My old digital camera had broken, so I asked my wife to buy me a new one for my birthday. As usual, the budget wasn’t huge, so I asked her to get a FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR, which, although being a reasonably high spec compact digital camera is, at the end of the day, just a compact digital camera.

The reason I opted for this camera is because I knew it had a CCD (charge coupled device) sensor and, based on a bit of Internet research, I had identified that cameras aimed at astrophotography were often called CCD cameras.

FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR Camera
FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR Camera

CCD cameras

In a digital camera, the sensor is the bit that converts light (entering the camera) into digital (electrical) signals.

To take photos in very low light situations such as photographing the night sky, you need a camera with a good quality sensor, and ideally one that is cooled to prevent the sensor from heating up too much during long exposures.

A CCD sensor is better for astrophotography than a CMOS sensor (which some digital cameras have), and the bigger the CCD sensor, the better.

Noise
In order to take photos at night, you need to use a long exposure time. One problem that this can cause though is that the sensor can start to heat up and cause ‘noise’.

So what is ‘noise’? Noise is apparent by the presence of colour speckles where there should be none. For example, instead of a blue sky, you might notice faint pink, purple and other colour speckles amongst the otherwise blue sky.

If you’re interested in knowing more about noise, here is a link to a good article on the subject:

http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_noise.html

The adapter

In order to be able to attach your digital camera to the telescope, you need to use a camera adapter.

camera adapter for astrophotography
Camera Adapter

Adapters such as the one shown here clamp onto the telescope, and allow the camera to be positioned in front of the eyepiece. They cost around £30, and can easily be found on the Internet if you do a search for ‘digital camera adapters for telescopes’ or something similar.

Setting up the adapter

1. Insert an eyepiece into the telescope and secure in position.

2. Using the telescope’s focus adjustment, focus on the object you want to photograph and, if your telescope allows you to, start to track the object.

3. Clamp the adapter to the eyepiece, taking care not to knock the eyepiece as this might cause the object to disappear from the telescope’s view.

4. Secure the camera to the adapter using the tripod socket. Again, take care not to knock the eyepiece.

5. Using the position adjusters on the adapter, move the camera so that the lens is aligned with the telescope eyepiece. Don’t position the camera too close to the eyepiece because you’ll need to leave enough space for the lens on the camera to extend when you’re using the zoom setting.

6.  Switch on the camera.

7. If necessary, use the camera’s zoom adjuster to get the image to fill the camera’s LCD screen (more or less).

8. Take the photo (see below).

The telescope/adapter/camera setup should look something like:

camera adapter for astrophotography
Camera Adapter Setup

Taking the photo

Having set up the camera and adapter as described above, you are ready to take a photo and, below, is my very first attempt at astrophotography.

Photo of the moon
My first attempt at astrophotography – the moon

In fact, this was the best of five photos I took. It was very windy and I was finding it very difficult to keep the camera steady, even though I had set the timer on the camera to 10 seconds. If you look at the photo you’ll see that it is slightly out of focus, which I think was caused by very slight camera movement.

The camera was set to ‘auto’, giving a very short (probably about 1/100 of a second) exposure time – the moon is very bright after all !

I used a 25 mm eyepiece, along with a 2x Barlow lens, giving me a resultant magnification of 52x.

The camera itself takes photos at 12 megapixel, meaning that the photo was huge when I opened it in PaintShopPro. I then cropped it to give me the image shown above.

Photo of the full moon
My second attempt at astrophotography
- a full moon

And here is my second attempt at photographing the moon, taken around 6pm on 1st January 2010.

As you can see, the photo is slightly overexposed – again I used the ‘auto’ setting on the camera, which made the exposure too long.

As with the previous photo, I took this photo using a magnification of 52x, and then played around with it in PaintShopPro.

Problems with this astrophotography setup

Update to this post: 23 April 2010. Having used the above telescope/camera/adapter setup for a few months now, I can see that it has a couple of limitations that I had not anticipated.

Firstly, you need to focus on the object before you attach the adapter and camera to the eyepiece. This is because when you view the object on the camera’s LCD screen, what you see isn’t as clear as when you look through the eyepiece. This makes it difficult to focus on an object by relying on the LCD screen. (I have updated the setup steps given earlier in this post to reflect this.)

Secondly, once you have attached the adapter and camera, it is difficult to keep the object in view on the LCD screen at magnifications above 50x. I have tried, and failed, a few times to photograph objects at 130x. I think the problem is that having located an object, it is very difficult to not knock the eyepiece slightly when you attach the adapter. This is not a problem at low maginifications, but certainly is at higher ones.

FREE Software Downloads

Observing Mars

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Date:  6th November 2009
Location: Weston, Hitchin, UK
Time: 10:30pm
Equipment: SkyWatcher Explorer 130P telescope

I had been waiting for quite a while for Mars to become visible at a sensible time of night – that’s to say – before my bedtime!

mars - as seen from the Hubble telescope

I had always suspected though that I might be a little disappointed because, although Mars is next door to us, it’s not really that big, and I had never read any articles where anyone had said that with a telescope like mine Mars was anything special to observe.

(When it is at its closest to the Earth, called favorable opposition by astronomers, it is only about 35 million miles away. At its greatest distance from the Earth, it’s about 250 million miles away.)

I knew that what I saw through my telescope was not going to bear much resemblance to the photo shown above, which was taken by the Hubble telescope…. and I wasn’t wrong ! Having said that, it would be pointless having a telescope and not giving it a go.

One of the good things about observing Mars is that it’s easy to see with the naked eye once you know roughly where it is in the sky. In fact, it has a maximum apparent magnitude of -2.9, but when I was observing it it was more in the region of 0.5 – still easy to see though.

The sketch below shows Mars’ position in the sky on November 9, 2009, at about 10:30 pm.

mars - position in the night sky

Being November, it was a bit chilly – not too bad – but cold enough to need to wrap up.

I took all my kit (telescope, eyepieces, etc) outside at about 10 pm, giving everything plenty of time to acclimatise before my observing session.

Even so, when I did start to fiddle about with the eyepieces I found that they still had a tendency to steam up a bit – not too much – but enough for me to notice.

As I said above, finding Mars was easy enough. As usual, I started off at a very low magnification (26x), and then gradually increased the magnification to 52x, 65x, 130x, and finally 260x. I was never really happy with the sharpness of the image though, even at modest magnifications like 65x or 130x. I could make out that it was a readdish color though, even if it was a bit fuzzy.

I understand that in January it will appear larger in the sky, so I think I’ll give it another go then.

Articles