Posts Tagged ‘Astrophotography’

Photographing the Moon with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P Telescope

Friday, May 28th, 2010

Date: 19th May 2010
Time: 9:30 – 10:15pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: SkyWatcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x (but not really important)
Exposure (camera): Various

This post contains a set of photographs I took of the Moon on May 19, 2010, at about 10pm. All the photos were taken at the same magnification (52x), using my SkyWatcher Explorer 130P telescope and a FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR compact digital camera. The only variable was the exposure time.

It’s worth pointing out though that the magnification wasn’t really important. This is because the moon is so big that you don’t need to worry about magnifying it very much. The eyepiece I used gave me a magnification of 52x, but I also adjusted the magnification of the camera itself, which would have increased the magnification a bit. Then, in PaintShopPro, I played around with the magnification a bit more to get photos that were a manageable size.

So, basically, I’m not sure what the final magnification is in the photos shown below.

The astrophotography setup I use (telescope, camera and adapter) is described in the post Digital Camera Astrophotography for Absolute Beginners.

Photograph Exposure Time
in Seconds
Photo of Moon with a 1.5 second exposure time 1 1/2
Photo of Moon with 1 second exposure time 1
Photo of Moon with a 1/2 of a second exposure time 1/2
Photo of Moon with a 1/3 of a second exposure time 1/3
Photo of Moon with a 1/4 of a second exposure time 1/4
Photo of Moon with a 1/5 of a second exposure time 1/5

You can see that a 1.5 second exposure produced a photo that was a bit over-exposed. This was also true of the 1 second exposure. Everything below that looks OK though, I think, although the 1/5 second shot looks a bit dark I guess.

Photographing Venus with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P Telescope

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Date: 11 May 2010
Time: 9:30 – 10:15pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: SkyWatcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): 1/80 of a second

My attempts to photograph Venus were, to say the least, pretty disappointing. The best shot I managed to get is shown below and this could be a photo of pretty much anything – it doesn’t really look much like Venus.

Photo of Venus with 1/80 second exposure time

I used an exposure of 1/80th of a second for this photo. I tried various exposures but nothing seemed to work very well. Most of them were completely over exposed and looked like white, shiny blobs.

The root of the problem though was that I couldn’t get a sharp (in focus) image of Venus through the telescope, so I knew the photos would all be pretty disappointing. I used PaintShopPro to give the above image an outline – the real image looked even worse !

I have to say that I have had better results in the past, when viewing Venus, using my small (50mm) refractor.

Photographing Saturn with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P Telescope

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

Date: 21st April 2010
Time: 9:30 – 10:15pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: SkyWatcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): Various

This post contains a set of photographs I took of Saturn on April 21, 2010, at about 10pm. All the photos were taken at the same magnification (52x), using my SkyWatcher Explorer 130P telescope and a FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR compact digital camera. The only variable was the exposure time.

This was an experiment for me, as I had no idea how long an exposure to use. I started off with an exposure of 8 seconds, and gradually reduced this down to 1/10 of a second. I’ve included a selection of photos with exposure times ranging from one second to 1/10th of a second. Exposure times above one second were way too over exposed, so I haven’t bothered to include any of them.

The astrophotography setup I use (telescope, camera and adapter) is described in the post Digital Camera Astrophotography for Absolute Beginners.

Photograph Exposure Time
in Seconds
Photo of Saturn with a 1 second exposure time 1
Photo of Saturn with a 1/3 of a second exposure time 1/3
Photo of Saturn with a 1/4 of a second exposure time 1/4
Photo of Saturn with a 1/6 of a second exposure time 1/6
Photo of Saturn with a 1/8 of a second exposure time 1/8
Photo of Saturn with a 1/10 of a second exposure time 1/10

You can see that a one second exposure time produces a photo that is over exposed; the 1/3 of a second exposure is also slightly over exposed. The 1/4 and 1/6 of a second exposure times produce the best results, with the 1/8 and 1/10 of a second exposure times producing slightly under exposed photos.

What is the significance of a telescope’s focal length?

Friday, March 26th, 2010

I’ve had my telescope for a year now and I have to admit that until very recently I didn’t know much about the significance of the focal length. OK, I knew that to calculate the magnification you need to divide the telescope’s focal length by the eyepiece’s focal length, but what if I want to take photos of planets? is a short or a long focal length better?

What is the focal length?

The purpose of the main optical element of a telescope (primary mirror or lens) is to gather light from an object and to concentrate that light into an image. This image is a fixed size but the size depends on the focal length of the optics - the longer the focal length the larger the image will be at the focal point.  You can think of this like the distance between a slide projector and the screen – move the screen and slide projector further apart, and the image gets larger, but dimmer.

The focal length is the distance from the mirror or lens to where the image is formed. The focal length of an optical system, such as a telescope, is a measure of how strongly the system converges (focuses) or diverges (defocuses) light.

For an optical system in air, it is the distance over which initially collimated rays are brought to a focus. A system with a shorter focal length has greater optical power than one with a long focal length; that is, it bends the rays more strongly, bringing them to a focus in a shorter distance.

Focal length is often expressed as an f/ratio:

f/ratio = focal length of lens/aperture of lens

Example: 130mm lens with a focal length of 650mm

f/ratio = 650/130 = f/5

What is considered a long focal length?

Long focal lengths are considered to be in the f/9 or greater range. A telescope of a given diameter coupled with a fairly short focal length, say f/5 produces bright images but wide fields.

This is fine for observing large deep-sky objects and star fields, but if you also want to observe planets, you’ll want a slightly longer focal length.

Speed - a bit more about focal ratio
 
Focal ratio is the ratio between an optical system’s focal length and aperture.  For example, a 100mm aperture telescope with a focal length of 1000mm would have a focal ratio of 10. 

Focal ratio determines photographic speed, so an f/5 telescope requires shorter exposure times than an f/10 telescope.  Therefore higher focal ratios are called slower, and lower focal ratios are called faster. 

Also, all things otherwise being equal, slower focal ratios produce less aberrations, but in many designs, a faster focal ratio produces a more compact telescope, meaning there is always some sort of compromise.

Problem with my SupaTrak Alt-Azimuth Mount

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

On Saturday (20th Feb, 2010) I was eagerly looking forward to taking a few more photos of Orion, but I had a nasty surprise when my SupaTrak Alt Azimuth mount refused to play ball.

When I switched on the handset/motorized mount, the Set and Go Cruise buttons starting flashing, and they wouldn’t stop. This rendered the the motorized mount useless as it refused to do anything.

Having put a post on a forum, it looks as though there might be a communication problem between the handset and the mount.

I bought my telescope (a Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P) just under a year ago, so it should still be under warranty if I need to return it. I hope it doesn’t come to that as I don’t want the hassle.

So, it looks as though for the time being I’ll have to revert to my 50mm reflector telescope … oh hum …

Update – 23 February

I put another post on a different forum, again asking the same question and, yes, it looks as though it is a communications problem between the handset and the alt-azimuth SupaTrak mount.

This morning I received an email from Telescope Planet asking me to return the handset. Hopefully, it is that rather than the mount, which would cost a lot more to send through the post.

Update – 04 March

Well, I’m still without a handset, so in effect I’m still without a telescope ! We’ve had some really clear nights recently as well, so it’s all a bit frustrating …

Update – 08 March

Still no word from Telescope Planet … and we’ve had some really clear skies just recently.

Update – 13 March

Today I received a new handset from Telescope Planet … but the problem still exists. I’ve sent another emal to Telescope Planet asking them what to do next. It’s looking as though the mount will need to be replaced.

Update – 18 March

I’m still without a working telescope. I feel frustrated at the moment because, although they are always very polite, I always feel that there is a lack of information from Telescope Planet as to what they are doing to resolve my problem.

I’m also aware that the nights are becoming lighter and I’m losing valuable astronomy sessions while my telescope is broken. I’ve also started looking at alternative telescopes – just in case I end up having to buy a new one. I need this situation with my broken scope to be resolved by the end of the month (March 10).

Update – 23 March

I’ve received an email from Telescope Planet asking me to package up the mount and handset so that they can be sent to the manufacturer for testing/repair. It feels a bit like pulling teeth, but I guess we’ll get there in the end.

Update – 30 March

Today I posted the mount, power supply pack and handset off to Optical Vision (the suppliers to Telescope Planet) so that the unit can be tested and, hopefully, fixed. I guess I just have to wait now.

Update – 08 April

I contacted Optical Vision today to see if they had made any progress with my ‘mount’ problem, but it was still waiting for a technician to test it. They rang me back later though to say that they had tested the mount and it was OK. They spoke to my wife so I’m not sure what was said exactly, but they’re returning everything to me – with another new handset (see 13th March entry above – I’ve been here before).

Anyway, everything should be with me by Monday (it’s Thursday today), so we’ll see.

Update – 16 April

Success – yesterday I received my mount, handset, and battery pack back from Optical Vision, and everything now works OK. The handset has been replaced so that must have been the problem (the replacement handset that Telescope Planet sent me a while ago must have been faulty).

So, in conclusion, a successful outcome even though it has taken eight weeks to resolve the problem. Everyone I have dealt with at Telescope Planet and Optical Vision has been very polite and helpful, although I have been frustrated sometimes by the slow progress.

Photographing Orion with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

Date: 17th February 2010
Time: 6pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: Not Used
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): N/A
Exposure (camera): 8 seconds

Photograph of Orion
Orion Constellation

Here is a photo of Orion I took at about 6pm on Wednesday 17th February, 2010.

I decided to not use my telescope for this shot, but to just stick my camera on a tripod and point it at the constellation.

I’m reasonably happy with it. You can easily see the main stars in the constellation (Betelgeuse in the top left corner and Rigel in the bottom right), and you can resolve the Orion Nebula, Messier 42 (M42, NGC 1976) – the brightest diffuse nebula in the sky – which is about 2/3 of the way down the image (in the dagger), just slightly to the right of centre. It looks slightly fuzzier than the other stars in the image.

FREE Software Downloads

Photographing Mars with a SkyWatcher Explorer 130P Telescope

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Date: 30th January 2010
Time: 6pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): 1/60th of a second

Mars 52x magnification 1-60th second exposure
Mars – 30th January 2010

Here is my second attempt at photographing Mars – still not very successful ! I took a whole batch of photos and this was the best one … it’s a bit tricky this astrophotography.

In the end I had to settle with using an eyepiece that gave me a magnification of 52x. When I increased the magnification upto 130x, I couldn’t find Mars on the LCD screen of my digital camera.

I think one problem is that the camera lens does not align perfectly with the eyepiece when the camera is on the adapter, so if the field of view is not wide enough, the camera can’t see the object even though the object is visible through the telescope itself.

FREE Software Downloads

It’s frustrating sometimes …

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Although I really enjoy being an amature astronomer, it can be really frustrating sometimes. Take last night (26th January, 2010), for example …

The sky had been slowly clearing during the afternoon and I knew I was going to be on my own during the evening – my wife had a work-related dinner to go to … great I thought – I can spend as much time in the garden as I want to without having to worry about whether my wife was getting annoyed at being left on her own … again!

I have been desperate to get some good photos of Mars, and this week it’s closer to Earth than it will be for the next couple of years, so I’ve got to get out there soon.

So, at about 7pm I got my Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P out of the shed, along with a selection of eyepieces, and left them outside to get used to the cold (very cold) evening temperature … the sky was still really clear … great!

So, at about 7:30pm I put my coat on, etc and go outside. I look up and, yes, it’s still clear … great!

I then spend the next 10 minutes or so setting up the telescope and camera and, I’m just ready to go when I notice that I can’t see Mars anymore … or the moon for that matter … yes – it’s gone cloudy … s**t !! … I guess I’ll put everything away then … there’s always tomorrow …

FREE Software Downloads

A really bad photo of Mars

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Date: 17th January 2010
Time: 10pm
Location: Weston, Hitchin, Herts, UK (about 52o north)
Telescope: Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P
Camera: FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR
Magnification (telescope): 52x
Exposure (camera): 1/60th of a second

Mars 52x magnification 1-60th second exposure
Mars !

OK, I know, this is not the best photo of Mars you’ve ever seen, but I thought I would post it here just to give an idea of how difficult it is to take photos of the night sky.

In my defence though, this was my first attempt at photographing the red planet, so to be honest I didn’t expect anything too impressive.

I also had a few problems trying to use my camera adapter (the thing that connects my digital camera to the telescope), and ended up having to use a lower magnification eyepiece (52x) than I had wanted to. I was also rushing because there was something on TV I wanted to watch.

I have now resolved the adapter problem though so, hopefully, my next attempt will be slightly better… we’ll see !

FREE Software Downloads

Digital Camera Astrophotography for Absolute Beginners

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

If you’re not completely new to astrophotography, you should probably quickly go back to your favourite search engine and perform another search, as it’s quite probable you know more about astrophotography than I do – so you won’t learn anything here.

OK, if you’re still reading, I guess you’re like me – extremely new to astrophotography. I’m a novice astronomer, with six months’ experience using my Sky-Watcher Explorer 130P telescope, and my photography experience is limited to pointing and clicking. Basically, I know virtually nothing about photography, and virtually nothing about astronomy.

The camera

My old digital camera had broken, so I asked my wife to buy me a new one for my birthday. As usual, the budget wasn’t huge, so I asked her to get a FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR, which, although being a reasonably high spec compact digital camera is, at the end of the day, just a compact digital camera.

The reason I opted for this camera is because I knew it had a CCD (charge coupled device) sensor and, based on a bit of Internet research, I had identified that cameras aimed at astrophotography were often called CCD cameras.

FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR Camera
FujiFilm FinePix F200 EXR Camera

CCD cameras

In a digital camera, the sensor is the bit that converts light (entering the camera) into digital (electrical) signals.

To take photos in very low light situations such as photographing the night sky, you need a camera with a good quality sensor, and ideally one that is cooled to prevent the sensor from heating up too much during long exposures.

A CCD sensor is better for astrophotography than a CMOS sensor (which some digital cameras have), and the bigger the CCD sensor, the better.

Noise
In order to take photos at night, you need to use a long exposure time. One problem that this can cause though is that the sensor can start to heat up and cause ‘noise’.

So what is ‘noise’? Noise is apparent by the presence of colour speckles where there should be none. For example, instead of a blue sky, you might notice faint pink, purple and other colour speckles amongst the otherwise blue sky.

If you’re interested in knowing more about noise, here is a link to a good article on the subject:

http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_noise.html

The adapter

In order to be able to attach your digital camera to the telescope, you need to use a camera adapter.

camera adapter for astrophotography
Camera Adapter

Adapters such as the one shown here clamp onto the telescope, and allow the camera to be positioned in front of the eyepiece. They cost around £30, and can easily be found on the Internet if you do a search for ‘digital camera adapters for telescopes’ or something similar.

Setting up the adapter

1. Insert an eyepiece into the telescope and secure in position.

2. Using the telescope’s focus adjustment, focus on the object you want to photograph and, if your telescope allows you to, start to track the object.

3. Clamp the adapter to the eyepiece, taking care not to knock the eyepiece as this might cause the object to disappear from the telescope’s view.

4. Secure the camera to the adapter using the tripod socket. Again, take care not to knock the eyepiece.

5. Using the position adjusters on the adapter, move the camera so that the lens is aligned with the telescope eyepiece. Don’t position the camera too close to the eyepiece because you’ll need to leave enough space for the lens on the camera to extend when you’re using the zoom setting.

6.  Switch on the camera.

7. If necessary, use the camera’s zoom adjuster to get the image to fill the camera’s LCD screen (more or less).

8. Take the photo (see below).

The telescope/adapter/camera setup should look something like:

camera adapter for astrophotography
Camera Adapter Setup

Taking the photo

Having set up the camera and adapter as described above, you are ready to take a photo and, below, is my very first attempt at astrophotography.

Photo of the moon
My first attempt at astrophotography – the moon

In fact, this was the best of five photos I took. It was very windy and I was finding it very difficult to keep the camera steady, even though I had set the timer on the camera to 10 seconds. If you look at the photo you’ll see that it is slightly out of focus, which I think was caused by very slight camera movement.

The camera was set to ‘auto’, giving a very short (probably about 1/100 of a second) exposure time – the moon is very bright after all !

I used a 25 mm eyepiece, along with a 2x Barlow lens, giving me a resultant magnification of 52x.

The camera itself takes photos at 12 megapixel, meaning that the photo was huge when I opened it in PaintShopPro. I then cropped it to give me the image shown above.

Photo of the full moon
My second attempt at astrophotography
- a full moon

And here is my second attempt at photographing the moon, taken around 6pm on 1st January 2010.

As you can see, the photo is slightly overexposed – again I used the ‘auto’ setting on the camera, which made the exposure too long.

As with the previous photo, I took this photo using a magnification of 52x, and then played around with it in PaintShopPro.

Problems with this astrophotography setup

Update to this post: 23 April 2010. Having used the above telescope/camera/adapter setup for a few months now, I can see that it has a couple of limitations that I had not anticipated.

Firstly, you need to focus on the object before you attach the adapter and camera to the eyepiece. This is because when you view the object on the camera’s LCD screen, what you see isn’t as clear as when you look through the eyepiece. This makes it difficult to focus on an object by relying on the LCD screen. (I have updated the setup steps given earlier in this post to reflect this.)

Secondly, once you have attached the adapter and camera, it is difficult to keep the object in view on the LCD screen at magnifications above 50x. I have tried, and failed, a few times to photograph objects at 130x. I think the problem is that having located an object, it is very difficult to not knock the eyepiece slightly when you attach the adapter. This is not a problem at low maginifications, but certainly is at higher ones.

FREE Software Downloads